| |||||||||||||
Nooooooo!!Nooooooo!!Posted Jul 25, 2002 5:53 UTC (Thu) by cpeterso (guest, #305)In reply to: The end of the road by cyanide Parent article: The end of the road For the past few years, LWN has been my favorite Linux news site. The content is short, sweet, well-researched, and intelligent (unlike some other Linux sites). I will definitely miss LWN.. <:~-( If this is truly the end and we are waiting for a miracle, why not discuss the financial realities of such a miracle? How much does it cost to run LWN? How much "real" money for ISP/hardware/etc costs? How much time per week is invested by how many people? How many regular readers do you have each week? How can we keep LWN afloat? Even if we don't find that miracle, I think this data (and the personal stories behind LWN!) would be interesting and useful for other people who might want to try their own hand at a news site. So long and thanks for all the fish!
(Log in to post comments)
Sorry to see you go. Posted Jul 25, 2002 6:51 UTC (Thu) by addw (guest, #1771) [Link] Yes, do say how much money is needed, and please break it down into at least staff and web hostings costs - someone may be able to help with part of it.Many thanks for what you have done over the years - I have read the weekly edition religiously.
Sorry to see you go. Posted Jul 25, 2002 8:41 UTC (Thu) by pflykt (subscriber, #2757) [Link] Yes, definitely put up the amount of money you are still missing - and update it when we readers donate some.Thanks for lwn, it has been an extremely useful source of information.
Real action (Was: Nooooooo!!) Posted Jul 25, 2002 10:03 UTC (Thu) by leandro (guest, #1460) [Link] If this is truly the end and we are waiting for a miracle, why not discuss the financial realities of such a miracle? Not only that, what can be trimmed? It’s hard to achieve the right balance among popularity, conciseness and completeness, but I particularly don't care about proprietary software news, about anything other than News, Resource and Events at the Security section, and anything but Recommended Reading in the Linux in the News section. And I don't care about comments: for me Letters to the Editor were just nice – I could live with comments or letters, but both are just a waste. I already said this at Slashdot: it's a pity that so much in the Web must grow until it's not viable anymore. Perhaps we'd have better stuff if Web news ventures like LWN would start small, find its financial ground, and only then grow. Perhaps a return to the roots would do the trick. For example, the format of the oldest edition available at the archives, January 29th, 1.998, perhaps is enough for most people and much cheaper to run. BTW one can go further back even more with the Archive, way back to January 15th, 1.998 – and that looks even simpler and cheaper.
Real action Posted Jul 25, 2002 20:26 UTC (Thu) by other-iain (guest, #2810) [Link] I've read LWN for about 4 years. My guess is that a reasonable subscriptionprice would have been $30 a year. That's $120. I gave $20 earlier, so that leaves $100 unpaid. I've just put that $100 in through PayPal. Consider this payment for Three people need about $300K a year to keep going full time. I'm sure My employer is now considering contributing something as well, since I serve Personally, I find the front page and the kernel page to be the only Good luck in your post-LWN ventures. Let us know who you're writing for
|
|||||||||||||