|| ||"T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingsworth-AT-gmail.com> |
|| ||Development discussions related to Fedora <devel-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org> |
|| ||Re: More unhelpful update descriptions |
|| ||Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:18:42 -0700|
|| ||Article, Thread
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Bruno Wolff III <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 09:39:01 -0500,
> Michael Catanzaro <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 07:34 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> I think it does now. I forgot to add a note when rushing one of the
>>> spin-kickstarts updates and bodhi didn't work and reminded me to add
>>> the note.
>> But just yesterday I got an update with the placeholder text.
I think the difference here is the web interface vs. `fedpkg update`.
Both will probably yell at you if the field is just blank, and that's
the default for the web interface, but `fedpkg update` includes some
placeholder text which it will happily pass on through if you don't
Perhaps the real fix here would be to just remove that placeholder
text (and double-check that the bodhi CLI rejects updates with blank
descriptions)? Personally I just find it really annoying to have to
backspace that out and fill in proper information every time I use
`fedpkg update`. It would make a lot more sense to me if it were just
blank and screamed bloody murder if it's not filled out.
devel mailing list
to post comments)