| |||||||||||||
Garrett: Secure Boot and Restricted BootGarrett: Secure Boot and Restricted BootPosted Apr 7, 2013 22:33 UTC (Sun) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)In reply to: Garrett: Secure Boot and Restricted Boot by mjg59 Parent article: Garrett: Secure Boot and Restricted Boot
The problem here is that our argument is: deep "secure" boot support collaborates with future restriction of boot. SElinux, OTOH, does no such thing.
You can see another difference in nomenclature: one pretends to be "secure", the other explicitly states that it is "security-enhanced". Who is blatantly lying to the consumer? :-D
(Log in to post comments)
Garrett: Secure Boot and Restricted Boot Posted Apr 7, 2013 22:40 UTC (Sun) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
So it adds security, you just worry that it can be used for evil? That's not what you said earlier.
|
|||||||||||||