| |||||||||||||
Google's "Blink" rendering engineGoogle's "Blink" rendering enginePosted Apr 6, 2013 8:38 UTC (Sat) by jschrod (subscriber, #1646)In reply to: Google's "Blink" rendering engine by KSteffensen Parent article: Google's "Blink" rendering engine
> it was a good joke.
No, not at all. It wasn't a joke - if you look at the guy's Web site you'll see that he's Apple-centric, all relevant IT posts revolve around Apple, OS X, iOS, and iTunes. It was not good either, FWIW.
(Log in to post comments)
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 9:22 UTC (Sat) by obrakmann (subscriber, #38108) [Link]
FWIW, I didn't even look at the guy's site (still haven't and won't), I got the link from elsewhere.
Personally, that post tickled my funny bone, and I also think that, as much as I love Google and wish them all the best, there's at least some truth to the statements. I do not buy that the fork has been made for technical reasons alone. I also think that the move makes sense, from a competetive standpoint.
Having said that, I will disregard your advice on what I am allowed to do and what I am not, which, frankly, I find way beyond appropriate.
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 10:54 UTC (Sat) by kragil (guest, #34373) [Link]
Do whatever you want, just take your "I just have to share this:"-links elsewhere, you probably like Facebook, so that might be the appropriate site.
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 19:43 UTC (Sat) by simosx (subscriber, #24338) [Link]
That post was very silly and not funny. It had not place on LWN.
|
|||||||||||||