| |||||||||||||
Google's "Blink" rendering engineGoogle's "Blink" rendering enginePosted Apr 6, 2013 5:57 UTC (Sat) by KSteffensen (subscriber, #68295)In reply to: Google's "Blink" rendering engine by jschrod Parent article: Google's "Blink" rendering engine
You take yourself way too seriously. Lighten up!
While the OP may not have been constructive in any technical sense it was a good joke.
(Log in to post comments)
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 8:38 UTC (Sat) by jschrod (subscriber, #1646) [Link]
> it was a good joke.
No, not at all. It wasn't a joke - if you look at the guy's Web site you'll see that he's Apple-centric, all relevant IT posts revolve around Apple, OS X, iOS, and iTunes. It was not good either, FWIW.
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 9:22 UTC (Sat) by obrakmann (subscriber, #38108) [Link]
FWIW, I didn't even look at the guy's site (still haven't and won't), I got the link from elsewhere.
Personally, that post tickled my funny bone, and I also think that, as much as I love Google and wish them all the best, there's at least some truth to the statements. I do not buy that the fork has been made for technical reasons alone. I also think that the move makes sense, from a competetive standpoint.
Having said that, I will disregard your advice on what I am allowed to do and what I am not, which, frankly, I find way beyond appropriate.
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 10:54 UTC (Sat) by kragil (guest, #34373) [Link]
Do whatever you want, just take your "I just have to share this:"-links elsewhere, you probably like Facebook, so that might be the appropriate site.
Google's "Blink" rendering engine Posted Apr 6, 2013 19:43 UTC (Sat) by simosx (subscriber, #24338) [Link]
That post was very silly and not funny. It had not place on LWN.
|
|||||||||||||