I like mutt too and use it all the time, but the one thing I really miss (and had back in 1996 on my riscos box) is the ability to look at several mails at once and cut and paste between them to synthesise a response from several inputs. This is incredibly useful and I used to write better mails in the 1990s because of it than I do now. Mutt can have one mail (and one mailbox) at a time open, and one has (so far as I know) to do an awkward dance with postponing the current mail, finding another relevent one, saving it to scratch space, re-opening the original mail then importing the new one to take bits from. This is very inefficient. I have started to use screen/tmux with several mutt instances to see more than one thing at a time, but this wastes memory and you still can't actually see them both at once. Perhaps I am just missing some much better way of doing this?
Posted Apr 5, 2013 5:49 UTC (Fri) by mp (subscriber, #5615)
[Link]
For mails that are in a single mailbox you can tag several before starting to compose the response. Then they will all end up quoted in your draft.
Yorba crowdfunding Geary development
Posted Apr 8, 2013 8:09 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Quite. This is a major reason that when I left elm for Gnus back in the 90s I never considered going back to anything like elm, or mutt, or gmail again. I need multiple mails open. I need my mails to appear in my editor so I can copy from one mail into a temp buffer if I need to, and I need them to stay open when I open another one. Gnus can do that without terribly much effort, because it's sitting atop an editor that can do multiple buffers natively. mutt can't.