| |||||||||||||
Lack of CarryOut in CLack of CarryOut in CPosted Apr 3, 2013 3:28 UTC (Wed) by tterribe (✭ supporter ✭, #66972)In reply to: Lack of CarryOut in C by jreiser Parent article: McIntyre: Scanning for assembly code in Free Software packages
> ((x<<=1)|CarryIn)
Conveniently, x<<=1 can be implemented as x=(unsigned)x+(unsigned)x, which reduces this to a previously solved problem. But honestly if you're decoding a bitstream a bit at a time, there are better optimizations to be done.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||