| |||||||||||||
A look at C++14: Papers Part 2A look at C++14: Papers Part 2Posted Apr 1, 2013 18:37 UTC (Mon) by heijo (guest, #88363)Parent article: A look at C++14: Papers Part 2
How about dividing the mass of mere library proposals from the actually interesting language proposals?
(Log in to post comments)
A look at C++14: Papers Part 2 Posted Apr 2, 2013 22:57 UTC (Tue) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402) [Link]
That's kinda the job of the open standards group.
A look at C++14: Papers Part 2 Posted Apr 2, 2013 23:13 UTC (Tue) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262) [Link]
If you mean www.open-std.org, it's noone's job and there is no open standards group, there's one volunteer who maintains the websites for several standards bodies.
There's a table at http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/03/pre-bristol-standards-pape... which categorizes the papers, the ones marked "Evolution" are probably the "interesting language" ones.
A look at C++14: Papers Part 2 Posted Apr 5, 2013 17:44 UTC (Fri) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402) [Link]
Head already spinning...
...I mean whoever's job it is to make the final decisions.
|
|||||||||||||