| |||||||||||||
they're not similar at allthey're not similar at allPosted Mar 30, 2013 5:39 UTC (Sat) by coriordan (guest, #7544)In reply to: they're not similar at all by coriordan Parent article: Google: Taking a stand on open source and patents
Now I'm not so sure. I read the court ruling a few times but I don't see where it discusses a patent being transferred to another entity.
Dennis Crouch's Patently-O is quite authoritative, and his summary is "Apple retains its license regardless of who buys the patent rights" - but it's not clear to me where he gets that from.
Maybe his summary is obvious when you know US bankruptcy law. But I don't.
Or maybe it's clear if you read the court cases referenced by that recent court case. I'll do that if I find time.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||