So, numbers of pages should convince us these are hard questions of legal interpretation being handled by justices scrupulous in their duty to interpret Congressional intent without their own political bias?
Find the time to read the documents and risk raising your own cynicism. Or don't and preserve your bliss. Pages mean nothing.
Posted Mar 23, 2013 9:42 UTC (Sat) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998)
[Link]
I know that some Supreme Court decisions aren't based on good law. This one seems to be, and your arguments against that doesn't seem to be based on anything written in the documents.
Cynicism hides reality at least as badly as any other simplistic philosophy. If you're not interesting in taking reality as she is, at least don't harass those of us who are trying.