Re: [all candidates] how to choose Jessie init system
[Posted March 20, 2013 by n8willis]
| From: |
| Gergely Nagy <algernon-AT-madhouse-project.org> |
| To: |
| debian-vote-AT-lists.debian.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: [all candidates] how to choose Jessie init system |
| Date: |
| Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:55:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <87r4jb9ez8.fsf@galadriel.madhouse-project.org> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
Gergely Nagy <algernon@madhouse-project.org> writes:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Some of the longest -devel thread in recent years have been about
>> Debian's (default) init system: SysV, SystemD, Upstart, OpenRC, etc.
>> Despite folklore, I don't think those thread have been (entirely)
>> trollish, they all hint at a concrete problem:
>
> (For the record, it's systemd, not SystemD. Sorry!)
>
>> How do we make an inherently archive-wide technical decision when
>> multiple, possibly equally valid solutions do exist?
>
> What I believe to be a solution in cases like this, is to sit down with
> the stakeholders (preferably in person; a conference or DebConf would be
> a perfect opportunity for this): maintainers of said systems, porters
> (primarily kFreeBSD & Hurd folk), the security & release teams, and if
> possible, upstream developers of the individual init systems too. I'd do
> this behind closed doors, initially, because the number of arguments and
> the level of noise needs to be controlled, and we've seen how well that
> works on a public mailing list.
Just to clarify: the intent here is not to lock people up until one
emerges, that would be useless and counter productive. I genuinely
believe that with the right people having a civil discussion can get
results out the door in a reasonable timeframe. They just need some
careful herding, is all. And face to face, that can be done - over the
internet, nope.
--
|8]
(
Log in to post comments)