Leader of the Free World (Wired)
Posted Oct 16, 2003 16:48 UTC (Thu) by
rfunk (subscriber, #4054)
In reply to:
Leader of the Free World (Wired) by rsidd
Parent article:
Leader of the Free World (Wired)
Outside of GNU Zealotland, there is no OS that considers
itself a distinct project from its kernel.
Outside of GNU/Linux land, there is no OS that is pieced together from so
many disparate parts.
The closest would be the BSDs, but notice that the BSDs have the OS and
the ports, while the Linux distros have every piece of software in
packages on fairly equal footing. The BSDs periodically import code from
external sources into their tree, but they do their development within
their own tree.
It is an accident of history that the Linux kernel is developed
separately from much of the userland;
Yes, but also a quite relevant fact. When the C library and the kernel
are developed independently, that's significant.
but my guess is that most userland developers consider
themselves "Linux developers", not "GNU/Linux" developers.
Actually I'd guess most of them consider themselves either "free
software" developers or "open source" developers, since their code
generally runs far beyond the Linux arena. Those who are writing
applications as "Linux" or "GNU/Linux" developers are needlessly myopic,
and need to be introduced to the wider Unix world.
BTW, I generally say "Linux" for the whole system just out of simplicity
and ease of communication, but I would never argue that it's the more
correct term for the whole system. (Actually I often call the system by
the distribution name, since that defines the OS somewhat better than
either the kernel or GNU do.)
(
Log in to post comments)