| |||||||||||||
"cache drives""cache drives"Posted Mar 6, 2013 18:02 UTC (Wed) by k3ninho (subscriber, #50375)In reply to: "cache drives" by mathstuf Parent article: The conclusion of the 3.9 merge window
>it's only 32GB when mounted (the rest being cache)
The rest is intended to be used as the NAND cells wear out. The device has twice as much silicon as it needs so that it can be useful for longer, given the high read-erase patterns of scratch caches. The rest is not cache.
K3n.
(Log in to post comments)
"cache drives" Posted Mar 6, 2013 18:30 UTC (Wed) by ntl (subscriber, #40518) [Link]
Yeah, I suspected something like this. So the drive exposes only half of its advertised capacity to the host. Assuming the touted "intelligent caching algorithms" are implemented in the drive and not the Windows-only software that OCZ provides, maybe it would compare favorably in a dm-cache configuration to conventional SSDs. Maybe not.
Anyway, the drives in the link seem to be EOL.
"cache drives" Posted Mar 7, 2013 11:09 UTC (Thu) by Tobu (subscriber, #24111) [Link] The caching is in their windows software, the SSD has no visibility on the HDD.
|
|||||||||||||