Remote desktop vs. remote display

Also none in their right mind will change car only because its tires got flat

Everyone should be apologist of how X network works... it could be substantially improved, yet maintain perfect compatibility (think of it like the kernel ABI)... and this is fundamental, kill X network and the desktop could not suffer much, but a good part of the "app server" business is gone...

There is this misconception that to "grow" you must change to new... its exactly the opposite... change when its a fail in "use" and "install" base, because this kind of changes mean exactly "born again", and you have to pass for the same growth pains allover again...

Wayland with improved X protocol in it is just X12... Improved Xorg with the Wayland protocol is also X12... X without X protocol is not X... Wayland without X is a disaster...

And worst, the ugly hack of running server on top of server a clumsy duplication that is not AT ALL in favor of fast or stability, could be buggy prone, and will flop miserably... more so because that is the *issue*, none of millions of potential users out there understand a word of you are saying... only *good* and or *bad* notions... yet they can feel when its real "draggy" or "instable", and they will NOT blame X or wayland or whatever, they will BLAME ALL, switch and stay away...