> I concur with spender's remark, the vulnerabilities could have been selected to underline a real problem with security and not just metrics with a DoS nobody will ever trigger (the ext4 one is a joke).
"could have been"? What about the HFS+ exploit?
As joey remarked above, it is a real issue..
By focusing on the ext4 DOS, you "forget" the other issue.
Posted Feb 20, 2013 13:52 UTC (Wed) by Trou.fr (subscriber, #26289)
[Link]
well it's a "real" issue but it's nothing compared to others that have a wide security impact as in every script kiddie can pwn a webserver :
1) outdated CMS with remote code execution (mostly PHP)
2) easy execution of any executable
3) ready to use exploit that works reliably as unprivileged user
The HFS+ vuln is not exploitable in that case. While it can be used for "physical" attacks like the USB key, it is not usable remotely.
_Thousands_ of servers have been compromised with that scenario :
1) vulnerable webapp
2) escalation to root using kernel vulnerability (or poor sysadmin)
3) ssh backdoor to collect passwords
4) compromise other hosts, goto 3
5) use compromised servers as DDoS platforms, proxy, whatever...
A story of three kernel vulnerabilities
Posted Feb 20, 2013 16:24 UTC (Wed) by bfields (subscriber, #19510)
[Link]
In the late eighties/early nineties I seem to recall infected floppy disks were the main (or at least a very common) vector for virus transmission.
If people don't exchange data on usb keys as much as they used to on floppies, perhaps that wouldn't be as effective these days.
A story of three kernel vulnerabilities
Posted Feb 20, 2013 23:59 UTC (Wed) by andrel (subscriber, #5166)
[Link]
Supposedly Stuxnet was transmitted using a USB key.
A story of three kernel vulnerabilities
Posted Feb 21, 2013 11:55 UTC (Thu) by Trou.fr (subscriber, #26289)
[Link]
Stuxnet used a vulnerability in the Windows shell (the so-called LNK vulnerability), not in the filesystem code.
As for floppies, viruses spread mostly by running infected executables, not using vulns.