| |||||||||||||
Opera moves to WebKit and V8Opera moves to WebKit and V8Posted Feb 17, 2013 23:50 UTC (Sun) by anselm (subscriber, #2796)In reply to: Opera moves to WebKit and V8 by Cyberax Parent article: Opera moves to WebKit and V8
But in reality Java works pretty fine across all supported platforms. Yep. They have had 20 years or so to get their act together, after all. The fun observation when Java was new was that Java basically claimed to do, as a big innovation, what many other languages (including Tcl, Perl, and Python) were already doing as a matter of course – while Java failed abysmally. The »everywhere« in »run everywhere« essentially meant »Windows and Solaris«, and that was only if you knew what you were doing. Java got to where it ended up because Sun spent millions in the 1990s marketing it to suits; based purely on its technical merits it would have sunk like a lead balloon.
(Log in to post comments)
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 3:13 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
Come on. I realize that it's popular now to bash Java, but remember 90-s.
There was NO fast cross-platform language in 95-97. Python was still very young, Perl was not fast (and, well, Perl), C++ was not nearly cross-platform (for GUI, in particular).
Java provided a way to create programs that run without large changes pretty much on all major platforms (even classic Mac OS).
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 7:51 UTC (Mon) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] Come on. I realize that it's popular now to bash Java, but remember 90-s. Java was well worth bashing even then. As I said, it became popular only because Sun was flogging it to the suits. Eventually it had had so much money poured into it that it had to become a half-way usable language despite itself, but at least for the first five years of its existence it really, really sucked. Few technical people wanted anything to do with it if they could help it at all – the big use case it was being touted for (browser applets) never really got off the ground, and for most everything else, many folks thought of Java as a kind of C++ with non-removable training wheels and abysmal performance. There was NO fast cross-platform language in 95-97. That didn't really matter with respect to Java because Java at the time was by no means »fast«, either. In fact, compared to other interpreted languages of the time it was pretty slow. Just-in-time compilation for Java – which was the technique that eventually did make a difference – became popular only later. Java provided a way to create programs that run without large changes pretty much on all major platforms (even classic Mac OS). So? Other popular languages did, too.
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 14:51 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
>Few technical people wanted anything to do with it if they could help it at all – the big use case it was being touted for (browser applets) never really got off the ground, and for most everything else, many folks thought of Java as a kind of C++ with non-removable training wheels and abysmal performance.
You're projecting.
A lot of technical people were thrilled with Java, because it FINALLY allowed to write large programs without spending hours compiling stuff or waiting for Perl interpreter to muddle through the code.
Java has never become successful on the client side, but on server-side it was an instant hit. A great explosion of OpenSource Java projects in 90-s attests to that.
> So? Other popular languages did, too.
I know only of Tcl/Tk which requires, shall we say, quite a bit of getting used to.
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 15:42 UTC (Mon) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] A lot of technical people were thrilled with Java, because it FINALLY allowed to write large programs without spending hours compiling stuff or waiting for Perl interpreter to muddle through the code. Yes, because Java in the 1990s gave you the joint benefit of both spending hours compiling stuff and waiting for the JVM to muddle through the code. Now you're projecting. I know only of Tcl/Tk which requires, shall we say, quite a bit of getting used to. Tcl/Tk is a lot better than its reputation. It is safe to say that if Sun had spent all that money they spent pushing Java on pushing Tcl/Tk instead (which would have been quite feasible given that Java was a SunLabs project at the time) the world would be a different (and arguably better) place. Remember that in the 1990s Tcl/Tk was a language that actually had serious commercial users all over the place, while Java was a language desperately in search of something – anything, really – it could make itself useful for. Set-top boxes, web applets, you name it. It is probably telling that Tcl/Tk, while never having had much of a marketing force behind it, is still popular in many places – and not unimportant ones, either.
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 16:50 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
> Yes, because Java in the 1990s gave you the joint benefit of both spending hours compiling stuff and waiting for the JVM to muddle through the code.
Java compilation was fast enough not to care about it. And JVM has had a JIT compiler since 96.
> Tcl/Tk is a lot better than its reputation.
Now, Smalltalk (and Strongtalk) might have been more widespread. That might have been more interesting.
> It is probably telling that Tcl/Tk, while never having had much of a marketing force behind it, is still popular in many places – and not unimportant ones, either.
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 17:19 UTC (Mon) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] And JVM has had a JIT compiler since 96. For the record, HotSpot came out in 1999 and became the default in Java 1.3, which was released in 2000. The HotSpot JVM was also not a particularly portable program, so the performance benefits of JIT were by no means universal to all Java platforms. (Which was fine by Sun because it meant that for reasonable server-side performance you pretty much had to be running Solaris.)
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 17:28 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
For the record, JIT compiler (not a HotSpot compiler) become available in JVM 1.1 in 96. This JVM actually had a pluggable JIT interface, so there was a couple of custom JITs.
The first HotSpot JIT was present in JRE 1.2 (that's why it was called 'Java 2') later in 97.
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 18, 2013 21:23 UTC (Mon) by pboddie (subscriber, #50784) [Link]
I suppose that adding a JIT that finally delivered on the research done previously on Self at Sun Microsystems probably did merit a major version bump, but Sun (and coincidentally Oracle) were masters at a bit of version bumping to warm over products getting a lukewarm reception.
For the record, I stumbled upon Java, Tcl/Tk, Python and a bunch of other languages at the same time, in around 1995. Java was the only one that needed me to get a disk quota upgrade and an account on a flaky Solaris server (whereas the others all ran on SunOS and a multitude of other platforms). I recall a colleague during my summer job showing me Java for the first time: Duke the Java mascot waving in an applet; premium UltraSPARC workstation required.
To be fair, I did get some mileage out of Java for a university project, doing a bit of graphics in AWT instead of using Xlib like everybody else, but a few months later I would saved myself the hassle of the dubious AWT implementation and used something like Python and Tk instead.
Sorry, how did we get onto this again?
Opera moves to WebKit and V8 Posted Feb 21, 2013 4:40 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]
> Which ones (with cross-platform GUI frameworks)?
Qt was started in 1991. I don't know when QtGui popped up.
|
|||||||||||||