| |||||||||||||
Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernelKroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernelPosted Feb 14, 2013 7:45 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332)In reply to: Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel by brouhaha Parent article: Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel
"" while there were significant advantages in maintainability, error recovery, and general robustness to having that driver code be in user space. ""
Naa!.. that was because your kernel (in kernel space) wasn't nearly as good as Linux... lol
Seriously, i think of a parallel, Virtual Machines... ummm... why don't run the all shebang in userspace ??
Almost impossible for many tasks & functions, right ??
A driver for a full blown GPGPU is the same. Things have changed a lot from earlier models... things can change dramatically in near future, you'll see... research like you mention is not only curious, it will be mandatory to do again.
(Log in to post comments)
Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel Posted Feb 14, 2013 15:11 UTC (Thu) by brouhaha (guest, #1698) [Link] Naa!.. that was because your kernel (in kernel space) wasn't nearly as good as Linux...Linux (in kernel space) wasn't nearly as good as Linux? No, I don't think that was the reason.
Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel Posted Feb 14, 2013 19:55 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link]
without wanting to molest feelings, but Linux how long ago ?
If it was as good as is now, why the fuss with all this development... make it worst ?
|
|||||||||||||