| |||||||||||||
Chromatic: Goodnight, ParrotChromatic: Goodnight, ParrotPosted Feb 12, 2013 19:46 UTC (Tue) by jond (subscriber, #37669)Parent article: Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot
I'm much more excited about perl7.
(Log in to post comments)
Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot Posted Feb 15, 2013 3:23 UTC (Fri) by chip (subscriber, #8258) [Link]
I think Perl 7 is when Perl really hit its stride.
I could tell you more, but the Temporal Prime Directive is not to be taken lightly.
PS: Y2K38 was fun
Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot Posted Feb 15, 2013 15:43 UTC (Fri) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link] Clearly to appease all parties involved the next Perl after 6 has to be 11, because Perl5+Perl6==Perl11.
Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot Posted Feb 15, 2013 18:24 UTC (Fri) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
Hm. I thought that Perl5+Perl6=Perl5Perl6.
Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot Posted Feb 15, 2013 20:02 UTC (Fri) by khc (subscriber, #45209) [Link]
that's clearly Perl5.Perl6
Chromatic: Goodnight, Parrot Posted Feb 15, 2013 20:07 UTC (Fri) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link]
Actually Perl5 + Perl6 is either 0 or "Argument "Perl5" isn't numeric in addition" (warnings) or "Bareword "Perl5" not allowed while "strict subs" in use" (strict).
But this sort of presumes that the future Perl 11 is a perl5 core with perl6 added to it.
|
|||||||||||||