| |||||||||||||
What about binder?What about binder?Posted Feb 10, 2013 21:32 UTC (Sun) by alison (✭ supporter ✭, #63752)In reply to: What about binder? by ovitters Parent article: Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel
ovitters, where does Greg reply about binder? On Google+ perhaps? I see no comment on his blog. The H Online does discuss Android intents but not binder specifically. It should be possible to support an intents interface with D-Bus, so it's not clear (and perhaps not yet decided) what solution is contemplated by those who discussed IPC at the Gnome Developer Experience event.
(Log in to post comments)
What about binder? Posted Feb 10, 2013 21:57 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
https://plus.google.com/111049168280159033135/posts/4cAYc...
search for binder. Took a couple of seconds to google it.
What about binder? Posted Feb 10, 2013 22:36 UTC (Sun) by alison (✭ supporter ✭, #63752) [Link]
Thanks, rahulsundaram. I wanted to make sure I read the same comments as everyone else and wasn't sure whether G+ was what ovitters referred to.
What about binder? Posted Feb 14, 2013 7:22 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link]
Just hope that this doesn't *bind* many novices out of Linux permanently (concretely in desktop)
One of the main motives for kernel Dbus for now is "Linux Apps"(it will have many more for sure)... but i definitely don't like the model at all...too much sandboxing you end up sandboxing the user out lol...
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/GNOME-developers-p...
To me it would be much better to implement "capabilities" in the style of EROS http://www.eros-os.org/eros.html
The masses are ignorant of this tech wonders... they aren't as savvy or seasoned developers as you gentlemen.
What about binder? Posted Feb 11, 2013 8:34 UTC (Mon) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link]
Sorry, should've been clearer. I meant the comments at Google+.
|
|||||||||||||