| |||||||||||||
this isn't moving D-Bus into the kernelthis isn't moving D-Bus into the kernelPosted Feb 9, 2013 18:55 UTC (Sat) by Wol (guest, #4433)In reply to: this isn't moving D-Bus into the kernel by Cyberax Parent article: Kroah-Hartman: AF_BUS, D-Bus, and the Linux kernel
YUCK!!!
So it most definitely isn't unixy!!!
Hopefully X over Wayland, or Wayland over X, will fix it, but it would be nice if it let you run programs properly over the network.
Cheers,
(Log in to post comments)
this isn't moving D-Bus into the kernel Posted Feb 9, 2013 19:16 UTC (Sat) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]
Well there are lots of IPC that doesn't work over networks. Like 'Shared Memory Segments', 'Semaphore Arrays', and 'Message Queues'. I don't know if you consider those 'unixy' or not, but they certainly have been around in Unix for a long time.
this isn't moving D-Bus into the kernel Posted Feb 10, 2013 7:14 UTC (Sun) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935) [Link]
And OMG, pthread condvars are not file descriptors!
this isn't moving D-Bus into the kernel Posted Feb 10, 2013 0:03 UTC (Sun) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
Next you'll say that UNIX sockets are not UNIX enough for you...
|
|||||||||||||