I think the point of my last comment perhaps wasn't effectively expressed.
I agree: it is a lousy logo, but pretty much all FSF/GNU logos are lousy. I think that goes without saying... which was actually my point; if I had to pick 5 things to comment on about the article, the quality of the logo would not have made the list. So it was not nearly understood by to me why it made it as the 2nd comment (of all the other alternatives). I guess I'm just different that way {;-)