> I just thought it interesting/surprising that despite all the "meat" in
> the article that the sole thing that you thought to comment on was to
> bikeshed on whether or not a crack should belong on an image of a bell
> in a logo. Is that really all you got out of it?
I hate how people have taken the term "bikeshed" and turned it into some sort
of Godwin's Law. Yes, eternal debate about small features at the expense
of actual development is bad, but that doesn't mean the small details aren't
I agree, without the crack that does not look like the Liberty Bell. In fact
it reminds me of older Bell Telephone company logos from the 1980s and
older. I look at that logo and think less of "Liberty" and more of "AT&T"
which is probably not what is intended.