[PATCH] SubmittingPatches: add penalty for forcing a maintainer to
edit a patch
[Posted February 6, 2013 by corbet]
| From: |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh-AT-linuxfoundation.org> |
| To: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org |
| Subject: |
| [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: add penalty for forcing a maintainer to
edit a patch |
| Date: |
| Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:43:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20130201154306.GA28473@kroah.com> |
| Cc: |
| Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk-AT-oracle.com> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Maintainers have to hand-edit patches (body of patches and changelog
entries) all the time. There needs to be some kind of penalty put into
place to keep developers from abusing maintainers.
Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index c379a2a..d1bec01 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ includes updates for subsystem X. Please apply."
The maintainer will thank you if you write your patch description in a
form which can be easily pulled into Linux's source code management
-system, git, as a "commit log". See #15, below.
+system, git, as a "commit log". See #15, below. If the maintainer has
+to hand-edit your patch, you owe them the beverage of their choice the
+next time you see them.
If your description starts to get long, that's a sign that you probably
need to split up your patch. See #3, next.
(
Log in to post comments)