| |||||||||||||
Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?"Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?"Posted Feb 6, 2013 10:38 UTC (Wed) by canatella (subscriber, #6745)In reply to: Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?" by canatella Parent article: Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?"
Sorry the link is not visible, javascript do have a let construct, see the previous link.
(Log in to post comments)
Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?" Posted Feb 6, 2013 17:28 UTC (Wed) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]
It still doesn't do what scheme's let can do, i. e. give a value a name within an expression.
Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?" Posted Feb 8, 2013 2:24 UTC (Fri) by idupree (subscriber, #71169) [Link]
Firefox JS console:
> 2 + (let (x = 3) x+x) + 5 13
(I didn't know that until I read the MDN page linked above.)
I think JS compatibility is the reason people aren't using it; even V8 doesn't like that syntax (tested in Chromium JS console and node.js REPL).
Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?" Posted Feb 7, 2013 20:57 UTC (Thu) by oldtomas (guest, #72579) [Link]
Yes, thanks for the link. At last -- this makes the language quite a bit more usable.
How's it that people is still using (function (foo) {blah blah}) (42)? Inertia?
Note that I *do* understand the construction, having read SICP, but then I'd take Scheme over Javascript any day).
Reitter: Answering the question: "How do I develop an app for GNOME?" Posted Feb 8, 2013 4:02 UTC (Fri) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]
I use it in some JS I've written (see uzbl) to minimize the public API of the JS code:
uzbl.follow = (function () { /* private implementation */ return { /* api object */ }; })();
|
|||||||||||||