Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
Poettering: The Biggest Myths
Posted Jan 28, 2013 5:21 UTC (Mon) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
Actually, launchd is under the Apache licence -- why didn't Red Hat just take it? (There are claims that Ubuntu considered launchd in 2006 and rejected it because of its licence -- APSL at that time. Apple subsequently relicensed it.)
Interestingly, one complaint about launchd I see from a Unix-loving mac user sounds exactly like some of the systemd complaints here:
Reasonable people can argue the technical merits of launchd, and I think a case can be made for improving the original init system. However, I have a deeper philosophical problem with all the functionality that has been rolled into it: One of the core principles of Unix programing is do one thing and do it well. Another is keep things as simple as possible. From that perspective, launchd tries to do too many things, creating needless risk and complexity.
Apple sees launchd as a natural improvement to traditional Unix; I view it as an anti-Unix monolith.
Posted Jan 28, 2013 5:40 UTC (Mon) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
Posted Jan 28, 2013 19:34 UTC (Mon) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds