| |||||||||||||
the point is that this violates the charter for -stablethe point is that this violates the charter for -stablePosted Jan 24, 2013 10:17 UTC (Thu) by khim (subscriber, #9252)In reply to: the point is that this violates the charter for -stable by butlerm Parent article: Long-term support initiative 3.4 kernel released
Yup. I'm surprised it's that controversial. Come on: Linus widely said that Linux will never support STREAMS yet we have syscall numbers dedicated to that support in mainstream Linux. If it's used in relatively large number of installations it deserves at least numbers reserved in mainline kernel.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||