| |||||||||||||
the point is that this violates the charter for -stablethe point is that this violates the charter for -stablePosted Jan 23, 2013 9:45 UTC (Wed) by kugel (subscriber, #70540)In reply to: the point is that this violates the charter for -stable by dlang Parent article: Long-term support initiative 3.4 kernel released
I was thinking the same, until I realized that I mixed up LTSI with kernel.org's longterm/stable release.
I guess for LTSI it's fine to drift away, and create a bit of pressure to upstream highly desired changes.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||