the point is that this violates the charter for -stable
Posted Jan 22, 2013 20:46 UTC (Tue) by corbet
In reply to: the point is that this violates the charter for -stable
Parent article: Long-term support initiative 3.4 kernel released
LTSI was never meant to be a stable branch; it is an independent kernel maintained for a specific industry. The inclusion of backported features and such was always part of the plan. The hope is to at least get various vendors working from the same kernel with added goodies and part of the process of getting them closer to upstream.
to post comments)