Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Making EPERM friendlierMaking EPERM friendlierPosted Jan 20, 2013 8:17 UTC (Sun) by geofft (subscriber, #59789)In reply to: Making EPERM friendlier by josh Parent article: Making EPERM friendlier
Fedora solves (-ish) this with a patch to bash to figure out if that's the cause of the ENOENT and give you a better error message. Other distros should pick up the patch.
(Log in to post comments)
Making EPERM friendlier Posted Jan 21, 2013 9:36 UTC (Mon) by pabs (subscriber, #43278) [Link]
... or Fedora could send the patch upstream?
Making EPERM friendlier Posted Jan 21, 2013 9:49 UTC (Mon) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Upstream knows and seems reluctant IIRC
Making EPERM friendlier Posted Jan 21, 2013 10:49 UTC (Mon) by micka (subscriber, #38720) [Link]
I think they're trying, but doing something less hackish, not in bash but at a lower level. But they're mostly at RFC stage at the moment (see article above...)
|
|||||||||||||