| |||||||||||||
Re: Stauts of these filesRe: Stauts of these filesPosted Jan 19, 2013 22:46 UTC (Sat) by simosx (subscriber, #24338)In reply to: Re: Stauts of these files by rcweir Parent article: A discordant symphony
Rob, you are toxic. In every reply you add a snide remark or two.
LWN a paywal? In four days the article will be public and people will see what kind of bully you are.
You say that you are only interested in coders?
You end up being a liability to the Apache Foundation.
(Log in to post comments)
Re: Stauts of these files Posted Jan 19, 2013 23:36 UTC (Sat) by rcweir (subscriber, #48888) [Link]
Well, yes. When discussing code I am mainly interested in talking to coders who actually want to make use of the code, not bystanders who are just looking for debating practice. Seems kind of obvious. Or at least I would have thought.
As for building a community, I think we're doing fine. 50 new QA volunteers in the last two weeks, based on a promotion that I took the lead on. Coders will be next.
In any case, don't feel that you absolutely need to respond unless you have a comment on the article. I'm happy to answer questions on those topics. But I'm not going to waste time engaging in meta-arguments, i.e., arguments about the argument, by those who have nothing useful to say about the main points of the article.
-Rob
Re: Stauts of these files Posted Jan 20, 2013 21:59 UTC (Sun) by simosx (subscriber, #24338) [Link]
Rob, you are a bully. You are playing the bully game and at the same time, by association, you make Apache Office look like a dirty project.
Your bullying trick now is to divert the discussion and make it personal.
What do you think the Apache Office community will feel if they see your comments? Do you object if I take the issue to the Apache Foundation?
|
|||||||||||||