Canon legal response
Posted Jan 10, 2013 21:59 UTC (Thu) by man_ls
In reply to: Canon legal response
Parent article: Testing Magic Lantern 2.3
Why is this? Just the usual cluelessness? I mean, custom firmwares are adding value to the camera body without Canon having to spend a cent, and so make the camera more attractive for free. I read the link but did not understand anything: is Canon locking down some features in the lower model and doesn't want people to unlock them?
to post comments)