|| ||Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo-AT-netfilter.org> |
|| ||Andreas Herz <andi-AT-geekosphere.org> |
|| ||Re: Formal submission of Xtables2 |
|| ||Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:57:51 +0100|
|| ||Netfilter user mailing list <netfilter-AT-vger.kernel.org>,
|| ||Article, Thread
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Andreas Herz wrote:
> On 13/12/12 at 12:00, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:00:07AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Please consider for merging.
> > nftables and its compatibility layer already provide this and we will
> > not have to maintain two different netlink interfaces, which is too
> > much overhead.
> Apart of your discussion (i think it's quite interesting although
> you might not agree), is there a summary of the status of nftables?
> The last time i read about it, while i was at the university, i
> thought it was dead. I read that Patrick McHardy was the one
> pushing the project but never heard any news after 2010. Now i read
> that Pablo is taking care of it.
It's true that nftables suffered an hiatus in its development, but
we're back on it and there has been quite a lot of activity on it
recently. This is the kernel branch, you can check the changelog here:
And there's an iptables compatibility layer that is ready for IPv4,
you can find details here:
> So i would love to hear more details on the roadmap for nftables, might
> be interesting for me and my work here.
I understand you want to know more on the future of nftables, but
because the way I am, I prefer to skip "hot air" wording by now and
talk on code done anytime soon.
So I have to request some patience from you. We promise to deliver as
much information as possible once we are done with the core features.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
to post comments)