Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Posted Jan 8, 2013 21:26 UTC (Tue) by mezcalero (subscriber, #45103)In reply to: Systemd 197 released by dave_malcolm
Parent article: Systemd 197 released
Posted Jan 8, 2013 21:51 UTC (Tue)
by jimparis (guest, #38647)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jan 8, 2013 22:52 UTC (Tue)
by mezcalero (subscriber, #45103)
[Link]
Posted Jan 9, 2013 2:30 UTC (Wed)
by dave_malcolm (subscriber, #15013)
[Link]
Posted Jan 9, 2013 5:34 UTC (Wed)
by jthill (subscriber, #56558)
[Link]
Posted Jan 9, 2013 23:18 UTC (Wed)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (5 responses)
I suppose there's a 'DFINSIZ' limit for the length of variable names too. Either that or the 'E' key was broken that day…
Posted Jan 9, 2013 23:53 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (4 responses)
I always wondered how EIEIO did happen.
Posted Jan 10, 2013 11:20 UTC (Thu)
by mgedmin (subscriber, #34497)
[Link]
Posted Jan 11, 2013 20:30 UTC (Fri)
by pcarrier (guest, #65446)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jan 11, 2013 20:49 UTC (Fri)
by s_hoop (guest, #49503)
[Link]
Posted Jan 12, 2013 10:19 UTC (Sat)
by zwenna (guest, #64777)
[Link]
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Does anyone value being able to sight-read the actual address values? Why not base64 them?
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
them _all_ for the 'eieio' instruction so that we wouldn't have to use
them anywhere else"
-- Linus Torvalds
Systemd 197 released
Systemd 197 released
Indeed, the error message corresponding to EIEIO is Computer bought the farm.
Systemd 197 released