| From: |
| Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org> |
| To: |
| David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
| Subject: |
| [PATCH 0/2] Mempressure cgroup |
| Date: |
| Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:27:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20130104082751.GA22227@lizard.gateway.2wire.net> |
| Cc: |
| Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
patches@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
Hi all,
Here is another round of the mempressure cgroup. This time I dared to
remove the RFC tag. :)
In this revision:
- Addressed most of Kirill Shutemov's comments. I didn't bother
implementing per-level lists, though. It would needlessly complicate the
logic, and the gain would be only visible with lots of watchers (which
we don't have for our use-cases). But it is always an option to add the
feature;
- I've split the pach into two: 'shrinker' and 'levels' parts. While the
full-fledged userland shrinker is an interesting idea, we don't have any
users ready for it, so I won't advocate for it too much.
And since at least Kirill has some concerns about it, I don't want the
shrinker to block the pressure levels.
So, these are now separate. At some point, I'd like to both of them
merged, but if anything, let's discuss them separately;
- Rebased onto v3.8-rc2.
RFC v2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/128):
- Added documentation, describes APIs and the purpose;
- Implemented shrinker interface, this is based on Andrew's idea and
supersedes my "balance" level idea;
- The shrinker interface comes with a stress-test utility, that is what
Andrew was also asking for. A simple app that we can run and see if the
thing works as expected;
- Added reclaimer's target_mem_cgroup handling;
- As promised, added support for multiple listeners, and fixed some other
comments on the previous RFC.
RFC v1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/28/109)
--
Documentation/cgroups/mempressure.txt | 97 +++++
Documentation/cgroups/mempressure_test.c | 213 ++++++++++
include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h | 6 +
include/linux/vmstat.h | 11 +
init/Kconfig | 13 +
mm/Makefile | 1 +
mm/mempressure.c | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/vmscan.c | 4 +
8 files changed, 832 insertions(+)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/