LWN.net Logo

A proposal for "rebooted" Python asynchronous I/O support

A proposal for "rebooted" Python asynchronous I/O support

Posted Dec 29, 2012 14:32 UTC (Sat) by njs (guest, #40338)
In reply to: A proposal for "rebooted" Python asynchronous I/O support by cglass
Parent article: A proposal for "rebooted" Python asynchronous I/O support

Twisted is seriously awesome. But I would be very surprised to see it end up in the standard library. Just to start with, twisted as a whole is a huge sprawling mess of variable quality code, so you'd have to extract some small pieces (just the reactor interface?), and even those interfaces probably have stuff in them that you'd want to clean up given how many years its been since they were first designed. And twisted relies heavily on zope-style interfaces, which have been rejected from the stdlib before. And twisted is still a long way from running on Python 3.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds