Posted Dec 28, 2012 2:06 UTC (Fri) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129)
[Link]
> Only if you think that it'd be an evil thing to do.
That seems a little far-fetched, don't you think?
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Dec 28, 2012 23:58 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link]
How about the killing of a substantial and well-defined subset of humans? Genocidal maniacs tend to see their actions as anything but evil.
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Jan 2, 2013 13:48 UTC (Wed) by rfontana (subscriber, #52677)
[Link]
Not necessarily. The license could be interpreted such that the standard for "evil" is not the subjective view of the licensee.
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Jan 2, 2013 16:31 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link]
I thought the licensor was on record as it being up to the licensee's interpretation?
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Jan 2, 2013 16:36 UTC (Wed) by rfontana (subscriber, #52677)
[Link]
I wasn't aware of that. If that is so, I withdraw much of my past objection to this license to the extent the licensor you refer to is the licensor in a particular instance.
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Jan 2, 2013 16:59 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link]
I have recollections of something like "If IBM thinks it may do evil, IBM would need to negotiate a new license".
GNU sed 4.2.2 released; maintainer resigns
Posted Jan 8, 2013 17:04 UTC (Tue) by mgedmin (subscriber, #34497)
[Link]
IIRC he said he gave an explicit right for IBM to use the software for evil, after receiving a request from IBM's laywers.