| |||||||||||||
Still working and usefulStill working and usefulPosted Dec 25, 2012 17:15 UTC (Tue) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)In reply to: Still working and useful by cmccabe Parent article: Vernooij: Bazaar-NG: 7 years of hacking on a distributed version control system
Have no fear, four of those packages have already ridden off into the sunset.
Of the remaining three, I agree, bzr is the least engaged. No need to hurry its departure, it'll happen soon enough.
Just imagine how many paid man-hours Canonical dumped into bzr...
(Log in to post comments)
not to mention it's a GNU project Posted Jan 7, 2013 14:06 UTC (Mon) by alex (subscriber, #1355) [Link]
The Emacs VCS is bzr because FSF favours GNU projects over non-GNU if they are functionally equivalent (and I believe an even split in preference amongst the devs).
|
|||||||||||||