| |||||||||||||
LLVM 3.2 releasedLLVM 3.2 releasedPosted Dec 21, 2012 16:53 UTC (Fri) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)Parent article: LLVM 3.2 released
Does anyone here know of a good PPA for those?
(Log in to post comments)
LLVM 3.2 released Posted Dec 21, 2012 20:58 UTC (Fri) by bredelings (subscriber, #53082) [Link]
They are in Debian experimental. They might work for Ubuntu, I don't know.
LLVM 3.2 released Posted Dec 22, 2012 1:11 UTC (Sat) by dankamongmen (subscriber, #35141) [Link]
[skynet](100) $ apt-get source llvm-3.2
Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done NOTICE: 'llvm-3.2' packaging is maintained in the 'Svn' version control system at: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-llvm/llvm/trunk/ Need to get 9,428 kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid/main llvm-3.2 3.2-1 (dsc) [1,988 B] Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid/main llvm-3.2 3.2-1 (tar) [9,402 kB]
looks like they're in debian unstable to me.
LLVM 3.2 released Posted Dec 23, 2012 8:56 UTC (Sun) by sylvestre (subscriber, #57054) [Link]
LLVM & Clang 3.2 are in Ubuntu raring.
They are directly sync from Debian, so, they should work.
LLVM 3.2 released Posted Dec 22, 2012 6:40 UTC (Sat) by pjdc (subscriber, #6906) [Link]
It's in raring, i.e. the upcoming 13.04 release: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-3.2
The PPAs listed on that page don't appear to have caught up, and in any case don't look like they're intended for folks who just want fresh LLVM.
If you're comfortable with programming and/or general system administration, backporting packages for upload to a PPA is generally not too difficult.
https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourceP...
Why Binaries? Posted Dec 22, 2012 22:33 UTC (Sat) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link] Binaries, Shminaries!! Why not compile from source code? It took me about one hour to do so (both LLVM and Clang) on a 32-bit Centrino Duo 1.6GHz laptop. And, since I had the previous version installed (also from source), I was able to compile LLVM and Clang with... LLVM and Clang. Self-hosting compilers FTW! </silly Saturday afternoon comment> ;-)
Why Binaries? Posted Dec 23, 2012 13:09 UTC (Sun) by fjf33 (subscriber, #5768) [Link]
But then you have to compile twice. Once with the old compiler and then again with the new one.
Why Binaries? Posted Dec 23, 2012 14:13 UTC (Sun) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link] And I did just that. Hey, I've got two hours to spare on a Saturday afternoon. :)
Why Binaries? Posted Jan 6, 2013 2:55 UTC (Sun) by nickbp (subscriber, #63605) [Link]
I hope you didn't forget to funroll all your loops in the process.
Clang has loop funrolling, right?
Why Binaries? Posted Jan 9, 2013 15:53 UTC (Wed) by hpro (subscriber, #74751) [Link]
funrolling; a non-copyright infringing name for the unexpected showing of a eighties music video.
|
|||||||||||||