| |||||||||||||||||||
Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 22:25 -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote: > On 12/05/2012 03:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Matthew Miller (mattdm@fedoraproject.org) said: > >> Three things: > >> > >> 1) Fedora is big enough that we have concrete situations where one size > >> doesn't fit all. Puppet being broken on F17 (and probably F18 as well) > >> is a fine example of something within the distro itself. And, as a > >> platform for development, offering more version choices to our users > >> would be a strength. > > > > <heretical> > > > > Well, then maybe Fedora's too big, and we should move to a model where > > Fedora is much smaller, and the grand Fedora universe contains things that > > are packaged *for* one or multiple Fedoras. > > > > </heretical> > > FWIW (probably not much), I also think this is a great idea. It feels > strange to me that the same thing contains & manages everything from > base system (e.g. kernel through core GNOME stack) and add-on apps (say > Battle for Wesnoth, to pick a relatively obvious example). > > Now, there's a bike shed to be painted over where the lines should be drawn. We could draw them between Core and Extras! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel (Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||||||||