Cool new Free software
Posted Dec 19, 2012 20:46 UTC (Wed) by
man_ls (subscriber, #15091)
In reply to:
Cool new Free software by nix
Parent article:
Status.net service to phase out, replaced by pump.io
Of course not, spawning a new process for every event is not a good idea. I did not explain myself clearly and got confused in the meantime. Allow me to reboot the thread.
The thing is that an event should only do what it is supposed to do, and nothing else. If the result of a mouse movement is that a counter is updated, then let the kernel do it, and not bother my own process; when my process needs to read the counter it will do that. If the mouse pointer is moved and I want to paint a cool shadow, then ideally I would let the kernel know and the kernel will paint the cool shadow. Many things work like that now; it would be great if it was the default mechanism to answer user events. Look at it as dtrace on steroids, if you want.
For a long task (such as a menu selection), then by all means create a process and let it deal with the event. Otherwise, store the new value and let me query it if and when I need it. Taken to the extreme I don't even need to have running processes except for background tasks.
(
Log in to post comments)