| |||||||||||||
A hash-based DOS attack on BtrfsA hash-based DOS attack on BtrfsPosted Dec 14, 2012 10:23 UTC (Fri) by Wol (guest, #4433)In reply to: A hash-based DOS attack on Btrfs by eduperez Parent article: A hash-based DoS attack on Btrfs
It can be a royal nuisance if they don't ...
Photo printers now typically print the filename on the back of the print. If I take a CD in and print from the in-store machine, it has my filename on the back. If I upload them, and get them by Royal Mail or go and collect, it has some random name on the back - and how do I *easily* track down the file it was printed from?
Cheers,
(Log in to post comments)
A hash-based DOS attack on Btrfs Posted Dec 14, 2012 11:03 UTC (Fri) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]
That's a non sequitur. Nothing prevents them from storing the original filename along with the photo (but not the photo under the original filename), and from printing the original filename (as opposed to the filename under which the photo is stored in their storage system) in the back of the physical print.
A hash-based DOS attack on Btrfs Posted Dec 20, 2012 3:53 UTC (Thu) by cibyr (subscriber, #87609) [Link]
If only my operating system had some sort of system for storing the contents of files with their names, then I wouldn't have to keep track of that stuff in a database...
Oh wait, we do have that! It's called a file system! I assume it can efficiently handle arbitrary combinations of file contents and names.
|
|||||||||||||