Posted Dec 13, 2012 1:29 UTC (Thu) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
[Link]
I'd go for option (c) Find the person who is requiring me to use this language clearly designed by either a parodist or a malicious idiot, and require them to explain to me in less than 150 syllables why I have to put up with it.
It's a mistake to ignore the customer
Posted Dec 13, 2012 1:36 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Ah, yes. I forgot that option :) . That's how I feel with the class/method names people tend to use in Java… Biggest thing it's missing is a "typedef" equivalent, IMO.
It's a mistake to ignore the customer
Posted Dec 13, 2012 21:17 UTC (Thu) by mirabilos (subscriber, #84359)
[Link]