| |||||||||||||
Security implications for user interface changes?Security implications for user interface changes?Posted Dec 10, 2012 0:24 UTC (Mon) by cortana (subscriber, #24596)In reply to: Security implications for user interface changes? by Baylink Parent article: Security implications for user interface changes?
> The items they wish to move "inside" the framing of the tabs *are not items which are different on a per-tab basis*; those items *do not belong inside the tabs*.
They don't? The state of the back/forward/refresh buttons and address bar are different for each tab.
(Log in to post comments)
Security implications for user interface changes? Posted Dec 10, 2012 0:57 UTC (Mon) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]
Yeah, they are not "the global addressbar, stop/refresh button, back/forward button"... they are "that tab's addressbar and buttons".
Just imagine: if instead of opening a lot of tabs you just opened a lot of windows, each window would have its addressbar and buttons. Then, if you use a tabbing window manager (that groups windows of the same program in tabs), then you would have exactly what Firefox and Chrome has today.
|
|||||||||||||