Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
GNU virtual private Ethernet
The poster's signature is "Director of Subversion", so regardless of whether he's actually tried git, he has some incentive to make comments like this.
No D on DVCS via github?
Posted Dec 7, 2012 0:02 UTC (Fri) by jtc (subscriber, #6246)
Yes, it's a very subversive comment.
Posted Dec 7, 2012 8:54 UTC (Fri) by man_ls (guest, #15091)
Posted Dec 14, 2012 6:54 UTC (Fri) by sitaram (subscriber, #5959)
And yes, most of those guys have designations similar to the one we're talking about here. And they're from companies that have been around a few years and have (I imagine) a sizable chunk of CVCS using customers. (Curiously I never see a "developer" or "development manager" from those places. It's always a "marketing director" or "business development manager" or some such!)
At the moment only I and one other person seem to respond with any regularity. No idea if there just aren't enough neutral+clueful persons there or there are but they don't care or they don't see it as a problem.
Would be nice if any of you folks with linkedin accounts would join up, keep an eye on the traffic, and respond once in a while!
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds