Re: GNOME now
Posted Dec 6, 2012 9:53 UTC (Thu) by dakas
Parent article: Re: GNOME now
I'm surprised the fact that there's only one distribution
of note still defaulting to Gnome 3 hasn't woken people up a bit more.
That one's easy: the GNOME developers are visionaries. Consider the history of Emacs 20: RMS forced MULE, multibyte encodings, on people at a time when most didn't want them. A considerable number of users flocked to XEmacs, which offered a sane 8-bit environment, while developers struggled to fix Emacs and make the multibyte support production-ready.
These days, multibyte support in XEmacs is still optional, and XEmacs is used mainly for "sentimental" reasons (meaning that the user base sees few new users, and a sizeable number of defections from users at intermediate level). One of the most cited reasons is the "mature" support of utf-8 that Emacs has. Of course, utf-8 support from XEmacs is quite better than what Emacs started
with. But making multibyte support mandatory at a time that was not really ready for it has given it a solid headstart.
Now that is the same kind of situation that the GNOME 3 developers see themselves in: they think they started on something new that will prevail in the long run, even though it is not necessarily better right now.
It's a theoretic possibility. But I am skeptical. They don't have, as far as I can see, someone of RMS caliber and appeal sticking to his guns, so even if one considered them on the right technical track, the plan could just peter out.
to post comments)