GNU Guix launches
Posted Nov 27, 2012 16:47 UTC (Tue) by
pspinler (subscriber, #2922)
In reply to:
GNU Guix launches by pboddie
Parent article:
GNU Guix launches
one other thought
I'm not advocating that "the dogs run free". The dogs do run free, however, when technical measures to achieve their goals have been exhausted and they adopt social or political measures to achieve them in another way.
I think this logic is faulty. To use an analogy "they're going to break security anyway, so why do XXXXX ...". The point isn't to be perfect, you can't ever be. The point is to put layers in place, each of which adds something toward the final goal.
This applies to procedures and people as much as to systems and security.
So, if, at a corporate level, I want people to comply with certain policies to protect what the company sees as its best interest, then yes, one layer will be technical restrictions of various sorts. Other layers will include policy manuals and websites, required annual training, easy contact points to the sysadmins and policy makers, scanning software, proxies and filtering software, and etc.
Sure, people will still work around that, but with stuff like this in place it makes these people think about it, and hopefully brings what they're doing to other people's attention. This is a good thing: it might mean that their solution gets adopted, that procedures get changed, or that an actual stupid thing gets squashed.
To use your example, "Oh, Janet installed inkscape! Hmmm ... do people need to be creating SVG's? Maybe we need to look at a wider solution for that. Oh, Fred installed a web server, and look, the logs show a bunch of external hits, uh oh, we need to squash that ...
My personal philosophy: people doing stuff isn't necessarily good or bad, but people doing stuff in isolation is most definitely bad. Corollary: people are lazy, and if they don't have to do something (like, say, tell someone else and document it), they won't. And yes, I'm like this, too. :-)
-- Pat
(
Log in to post comments)