| |||||||||||||
Backwards compatibility over featuresBackwards compatibility over featuresPosted Nov 23, 2012 17:08 UTC (Fri) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)In reply to: Backwards compatibility over features by man_ls Parent article: GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode
The other difference is that Linux is perceived as riskier. To succeed there must not be cases like this where people's suspicious appear to be confirmed; on compatibility the Linux desktop needs to set a *higher* standard than its proprietary counterparts, not a lower or even an equal one.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||