| |||||||||||||
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" modeGNOME Shell to support a "classic" modePosted Nov 23, 2012 10:01 UTC (Fri) by jcm (subscriber, #18262)In reply to: GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode by drago01 Parent article: GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode
Sure, devices without GPU acceleration may be non-competitive these days, but the hardware isn't the problem. It's access to good quality drivers that is still and issue. XFCE runs well on everything I have, is well designed, and doesn't call for 3D acceleration everywhere it's not needed (and 3D acceleration is needed precisely never on a desktop).
(Log in to post comments)
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode Posted Nov 23, 2012 10:36 UTC (Fri) by kigurai (guest, #85475) [Link]
Needed and "darned convenient and pretty" are not the same thing.
I could probably do everything I do in Win 3.11 or CDE, if the applications would run there. I don't NEED anything else, really. But I WANT a prettier desktop with more functionality. If you are happy with XFCE, then run XFCE. I tried the Fedora XFCE spin on a netbook quite recently. Quite quickly changed back to Gnome 3 since it works better (for me). Sure, it is slower than XFCE, but it was an acceptable loss to get the added functionality.
|
|||||||||||||