| |||||||||||||
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" modeGNOME Shell to support a "classic" modePosted Nov 21, 2012 19:38 UTC (Wed) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950)In reply to: GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode by Zizzle Parent article: GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode
Please be less vague, less accusing and less pointless sarcasm. That or don't complain when you get a response in kind.
As said elsewhere: XMMS still will run fine under GNOME 3. And I do mean the gtk+1.x compiled XMMS, though maybe your distribution doesn't ship it anymore.
(Log in to post comments)
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode Posted Nov 21, 2012 19:47 UTC (Wed) by Zizzle (guest, #67739) [Link]
So XMMS with gtk+1.x is the official media player for GNOME3?
All the iTunes users will be jealous. This year will surely be the year of the linux desktop.
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode Posted Nov 21, 2012 20:02 UTC (Wed) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link] Ah, the stupid sarcasm again. Anyway, to quote yourself
And what do we users gain from all this application breakage? You said application breakage in some weird relation to the GNOME 2 panel. I responded to that. Now instead it is about some official GNOME 3 media player? Whatever.
GNOME Shell to support a "classic" mode Posted Nov 21, 2012 20:54 UTC (Wed) by Zizzle (guest, #67739) [Link]
> You said application breakage in some weird relation to the GNOME 2 panel
Someone complained about parallel installs of GNOME2 and 3.
ebassi says that the gnome 2 libs are parallel installable so it's all good.
But then later admits that doesn't actually help that much since application functionality is often reduced/broken in GNOME3. HIS example was Banshee. But it's all the user/applications fault, not GNOME3.
I questioned the benefits of the changes that caused that breakage.
Your defense was that OMG! XMMS still works.
A true WTF. I'm not even sure why you would make the leap to XMMS.
XMMS has nothing to do with this conversation.
|
|||||||||||||