| |||||||||||||
The monoculture of meritocracyThe monoculture of meritocracyPosted Nov 17, 2012 16:53 UTC (Sat) by Jandar (subscriber, #85683)In reply to: The monoculture of meritocracy by ortalo Parent article: Crowding out OpenBSD
> And specifically, Linux should *stop* claiming these targets (because they are for the BSDs).
If anyone using linux has an itch to scratch in these areas, should it be forbidden for him/her to improve linux? Do we patronazingly say: go away, linux has to be awful in this so that *BSD can shine a little?
(Log in to post comments)
The monoculture of meritocracy Posted Nov 24, 2012 22:02 UTC (Sat) by mfedyk (guest, #55303) [Link]
I think we should call this initiative "no os left behind".
Unions for the developers would be good too.
The monoculture of set theory Posted Nov 24, 2012 22:28 UTC (Sat) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359) [Link]
> Unions for the developers would be good too.
I prefer intersections. They let you work together without forcing you to.
The monoculture of set theory Posted Nov 25, 2012 3:50 UTC (Sun) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]
Personally, I prefer complements. Because I'm a contrarian.
|
|||||||||||||